So, the wife-beating episode of Outlander has been out there for a couple of weeks now, and I might be more upset about the reactions of people who haven’t read the books than people who have.
You go to any TV discussion site, or any review of the show, and the conversations are full of discussions with titles like “Claire is a Fucking Bitch!” (sorry, but that truly is one I’ve seen) followed by everyone saying she deserved worse than the beating she got.
Annnd… so much for feminism, equality and White Ribbon Days! No wonder we’re getting nowhere with domestic violence in the present, when the people in the present are still overjoyed with scenes like this.
The thing about Outlander is that the “It’s historically accurate! Jamie said a man would have been punished in a worse way!” argument is total crap. Diana Gabaldon picked choice pieces of history, mixed them up with the popular tropes of the bodice ripper era the book was written in, and then made a whole lot of stuff up.
Claire wasn’t beaten because history made Gabaldon write the book that way. Gabaldon wanted to include a scene where Claire got beaten with a leather belt, and so she twisted her understanding of Georgian era Scotland to justify the violence.
It’s exactly the same as the ludicrous claims women could expect to be raped every time they stepped out of their house, and by every single man they saw. “But, but, but… it’s history!” doesn’t work there, either.
Don’t believe me, look up the message boards where she rants at her UK editors who tried to correct some of her mistakes before releasing Outlander in Britain. Not knowing when World War Two ended was one biggie.
The Outlander show twisted the wife-beating scene into the episode’s comic relief, which disgusted me. Because now next to nobody is having a discussion about domestic violence or misogyny, OR questionable research.
Instead, everyone has decided it’s yet another opportunity to hate on women.